Land Value Taxation Campaign

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Current Affairs

Current Affairs Comment

Tax system locks people into poverty

E-mail Print PDF
The tax system locks people out of work and into poverty. How does it do this? There is no need to go into too many details. Just work out these figures and you will see the size of the barrier against work.

Tax Justice Network - a bad case of cognitive dissonance

E-mail Print PDF
Useful ammunition for the LVT case can always be obtained from Tax Justice Network and Tax Research. But both have come under attack lately from the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands, where there is anger about their activities. TJN is headed by John Christensen, and is a campaign against tax avoidance and tax havens. The website has the title "Tax havens cause poverty" - a questionable assertion.

Elusive offshore owners leave London mansions to crumble

E-mail Print PDF
An article in the Guardian today notes that there are an estimated 1m empty homes in the UK, and about 3,000 of them in the Central London borough of Westminster. Some of them, in Mayfair, are mansions are worth as much as £50m, even in their dilapidated state. Many of the biggest and most expensive are owned not by dusty old dowagers down on their luck but by mystery investors hiding their identities behind offshore companies.

The arguments we have to answer

E-mail Print PDF

That's my home. Get your dirty tax hands off it

Homeowners instinctively hate a mansion tax. They feel their hard-earned bricks and mortar should be beyond the State. So wrote Matthew Parris in today's Times. The article is worth reading and so are the dozens of comments that follow,

The Tax Wedge

E-mail Print PDF

Our resident accountant has just been analysing the effect of the current tax rates. Their most significant impact is of course at the margin. An unemployed single person receives about £200 a week in Jobseekers' Allowance, housing benefit, &c. Of that, about £20 a week is paid back to the government in tax, a nice example of churning, so the real purchasing power of the £200 is £180. If the unemployed individual starts working, the gross labour cost to the employer must be not less than £315 a week if the net pay is to be more than the amount received in benefit. In other words there is an employment tax surcharge of 57% on marginal labour. This figure used to be known as the Tax Wedge, but because economics has fashions, it is not a phrase that is heard these days. In terms of real purchasing power, the employer's burden is 71%.

Which helps to explain why some people are trapped in idleness and welfare dependency, while jobs are exported to places like China, India and Thailand - or don't get done at all.


£15.26 for two hours' busking

E-mail Print PDF
A while ago we posted Sounds from the Deep, an article about busking on the London Underground as an illustration of Ricardo's Law of Rent and the effects of taxation. A Financial Times journalist actually tried it recently and earned just £15.26 for two hours' busking at the foot of the escalators at Leicester Square

According to the article, musicians can busk free of charge once they have passed an audition for a licence. Unsurprisingly, there is a waiting list, which suggest that there is economic rent waiting to be collected. Link to article

LVT best for hard-working families

E-mail Print PDF
The Sunday Express last week came out with an article condemning what was referred to as a "land levy".

'A PLAN to scrap council tax in favour of a land levy was condemned last night as penalising hard-working middle-class families. The Land Value Tax was proposed by Compass, a Left-wing think tank close to Gordon Brown's inner circle. It would raise even more than the £25.6billion a year currently taken by local authorities through council tax and would hit hardest those who have worked their way up the property ladder. Owners of family homes on decent-size plots with a garden, a drive or a garage would be hit harder than those who live in smaller properties. And if the house is near good schools or public transport links, the land would be taxed even more. Tory housing spokesman Grant Shapps described the idea as ¬≠thoroughly unappealing. "The Prime Minister's favourite think-tank has come up with an idea which will disproportionately hit hard-pressed families who are aspirational and doing their best to get on," he said.'

Is this true? Who exactly will be hit?

Page 7 of 19

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy.

I accept cookies from this site

EU Cookie Directive Plugin Information