Land Value Taxation Campaign

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Land Value Taxation

In this section of the web site we have a series of FAQs to help people further their understanding about the application and benefits of Land Value Tax.

If you have any questions at all why not contact us at the LVTC and ask - we can add the answers to this section.

Is LVT a threat to the landscape?

E-mail Print PDF

"Without special exemptions, land value taxation policy would cause loss of habitats such as ancient woodland heath etc in private ownership but not designated as sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs). It could also impair the protection of historic landscapes."


Land doesn't matter any more - again

E-mail Print PDF
It is interesting how the arguments against LVT so often have to postulate impossible situations. Here is an example from the Guardian's Comment is Free discussion group, as part of its present campaign against tax avoidance. The point put in favour of LVT was...

"If taxation is tied to the holding of land titles, then it can not be avoided. Everyone uses land. Nor can land be hidden or removed to a tax haven. The tax payable needs to be a proportion of its annual rental value. If this reform was implemented, then tax cannot be avoided."

The response that came back was...

Oh absolutely staggeringly brilliant. So in your system a company that is based on intellectual property - say Google- could rent some premises in the Outer Hebrides and basically pay no tax at all. Marvelous.

This produced two separate counters

All the objections answered in one go

E-mail Print PDF

All the FAQs answered at one in this comment by IanCb in the Guardian's Comment is free.


LVT would put up the price of food

E-mail Print PDF
"A land tax as you propose  would simply increase the cost of land and all it provides including food."

Land value is the residual value after all other costs have been met. That is standard economic theory and readily observable - there are numerous test situations which have shown this eg shops do not charge more for their goods if they are paying high rents.

The person who made this comment was asked if they could explain how a land value tax might push up prices, as it would have been very interesting to know what the mechanism was. No reply came.

"People and organisations that don't 'own' land won't pay any tax"

E-mail Print PDF
How about this objection to LVT from the Guardian's Comment is Free?

"So people and organisations which don't 'own' land but just rent or borrow it won't pay any tax? Sounds like a top plan."

Everyone uses land. Either they own it or they rent it. Whatever the case, they make a contribution to the LVT.

Land doesn't matter in this age of technology

E-mail Print PDF
Land doesn't matter any more, people often say. This is the sort of comment we often receive...
Are you stuck in the 17th century or something? Land doesn't mean an awful lot when food can be shipped in cheap from Africa and your entire business is an office.

Surely land doesn't matter any more?

E-mail Print PDF

The argument goes like this...

Land does not determine production of non-organic goods. Since we discovered fossil fuels we have had a mineral energy source that can produce huge amounts of energy and does not have to be grown, like wood has to. With an unlimited supply of energy and materials (for the last two hundred years and maybe another 50) the West was able to industrialise, and land as a factor of production no longer mattered. How else was Japan able to become an industrial giant, when it is a small mountainous island with little of its own raw materials.

The argument about land and housing may be applicable to South-East England, but America? And America is where the trigger for the financial collapse came.


LVT would be unfair to savers who had invested in land

E-mail Print PDF
We sometimes come across the objection that LVT would be unfair to people who had chosen to put their savings into property. A question that came up recently was that,

"People like me who have chosen to put their savings into a property, and it is the main, if not only source of their pension, would seemingly see this pension whittled away by such a tax. It would unfairly advantage those on other forms of pension, especially final salary schemes and, in particular, the gold plated public sector pensions, for which a property asset is a meagre replacement. How can one justify advocating a scheme which so dramatically favoured one form of pension saver over another?"

Wouldn't most people be against an ongoing tax on their property?

E-mail Print PDF
Very few people own both the land on which they conduct their businesses and the land on which their homes stands. Most pay rent or work for wages. So having to pay tax on land is no big issue for most people. What is an issue for nearly everyone is having to pay tax on the products of their labour - on honest work.

Wouldn't LVT encourage overdevelopment?

E-mail Print PDF
Nobody is proposing that the planning system be abolished, and planning control is a major constraint on tall buildings. But it is the lack of a land value tax that leads to persistent attempts to put up tall buildings, often in unsuitable locations with poor access. This is because so much land is underused or unused, that an artificial shortage is created which makes it economically viable to over-develop land. In reality the demand for housing and office space is not infinite but constrained by population size, transport access, etc. Nobody would want to put up an office block out in the middle of nowhere if there was an ample supply of premises in central locations.

Isn't a Flat Tax better?

E-mail Print PDF

More arguments against LVT come from an advocate of the Flat Tax. The author suggests a 20% flat rate above £20k, Why 20%? Why 20k allowance? Would that be the same for a big company as a one-man business? What counts as deductable expenses? It isn't quite as simple as it looks at first glance.

The objector raises some complex and interesting points (below, italics) which are here answered.


Page 4 of 5

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy.

I accept cookies from this site

EU Cookie Directive Plugin Information