Land Value Taxation Campaign

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home FAQ Isn't the UBR already a land value tax?

Isn't the UBR already a land value tax?

E-mail Print PDF

We have heard more than a few times that we already have LVT in the form of the UBR. We have even come across this statement in government responses when we have put the LVT case.

True, the Uniform Business Rate is a sort of land value tax, but a very poorly implemented one. Land in residential use is substantially exempt, being subject to the Council Tax instead. Vacant land is exempt. Agricultural land is exempt. All of these things promote mis-use and under-use of land and introduce damaging market distortions. They prevent rents and property prices from dropping to market-clearing levels, thereby promoting both booms and slumps, the latter becoming unduly prolonged when they happen.

Experience with the Enterprise Zones shows, however, that it is not a cost borne by businesses but by landowners. When the tax is relieved, the rents rise to compensate, taking away all of the intended benefit to business. This is why the implementation of LVT could usefully begin with reform of the UBR.

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy.

I accept cookies from this site

EU Cookie Directive Plugin Information