Land Value Taxation Campaign

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

LVT would be unfair to savers who had invested in land

E-mail Print PDF
We sometimes come across the objection that LVT would be unfair to people who had chosen to put their savings into property. A question that came up recently was that,

"People like me who have chosen to put their savings into a property, and it is the main, if not only source of their pension, would seemingly see this pension whittled away by such a tax. It would unfairly advantage those on other forms of pension, especially final salary schemes and, in particular, the gold plated public sector pensions, for which a property asset is a meagre replacement. How can one justify advocating a scheme which so dramatically favoured one form of pension saver over another?"
Read more...
 

Cross-Party Coalition formed with a new solution to economic crises

E-mail Print PDF
In an unprecedented move to advocate an original solution to the current economic crisis, twelve think-tanks, charities and political pressure groups have joined forces. The new cross-party group, called the Coalition for Economic Justice (CEJ), has argued for the reduction of existing taxes to be replaced by an annual Land Value Tax in order to prevent future crises and alleviate the current one.
Read more...
 

Can the state protect human rights?

E-mail Print PDF
Prompted by the economic crisis and the sixtieth anniversary of the UN declaration, human rights have been the subject of several pieces arguing that states should have a stronger role to ensure that people's rights are protected. But human rights are not guaranteed by defining them as such, rather they arise by defining the corresponding duties which confer those rights. Once the duties of the state and of the individual are defined, both positively and negatively, the rights emerge naturally.
Read more...
 

Tax system soaks the poor

E-mail Print PDF
One of the vile things about the UK's current taxation system is that it reaches so far down the income scale. So says Tim Worstall in an article in The Guardian, arguing that the statutory minimum wage should not be increased. Worstall pointed out that "it is possible to be working part-time on the minimum wage and be paying income tax. Indeed, a full-time worker who gets that pre-tax £13,400 will be paying about £1,500 a year in income tax to say nothing of further National Insurance deductions. That £13,400 minus £1,500 is £11,900 – which is just about the amount a full-time minimum wage worker will make before tax. So, if we weren't taxing the working poor then, by the measurement of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, they wouldn't be poor.

"Or if you'd prefer the whole thing in a nutshell, if we want to make the working poor better off, then we should stop bloody taxing them."

Yes. And if existing taxes on labour were replaced by LVT, there would be no need for a statutory minimum wage at all because employers would not be able to get anyone to work for penurious wages. In a programme for the introduction of LVT, the first taxes to be abolished should be those on low-paid workers, which would be achieved by raising tax and national insurance thresholds. Those working for 40 hours on the statutory minimum wage should not be paying tax. Only it is not the employees who pay it. The burden falls on employers and forms part of labour costs. By reducing the cost of employing people, raising thresholds is the most effective way of getting as many people as possible into employment.

 
More Articles...
Page 2 of 4

Have your say?

Do you have something to say?
Would you like to contribute to this web site?

Read more...

Who's Online

We have 75 guests online

RSS Syndication