Land Value Taxation Campaign

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Blog

The LVTC blog, by Henry Law

The comments in the LVTC Blog are a personal view of our Hon. Secretary Henry Law and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Campaign.

This is a place for personal observations and comments on politics, economics, current affairs, on-going discussions on the potential for LVT to remedy some of the current ills, and the impact on Society of any of the above. 

Please read and enjoy, and feel free to respond to Henry if you have any thing you would like to add.

Property boosts UK net worth to £6.8 trillion

E-mail Print PDF
Britain's property market has boosted the nation’s wealth to £6.8 trillion, despite a global financial crisis which has weighed heavily on the UK economy. Net worth rose 3.3pc in 2011 according to figures from the Office for National Statistics, with property now worth more than £4 trillion. Read the article in the Daily Telegraph. It is complete nonsense of course but illustrates the dangerous hold that home-ownerism has on the nation's psyche. You might like to join in the chorus of encouragingly scornful comment

Back to business - and LVT good for landowners

E-mail Print PDF
Not quite. But the Olympics and the holiday season have squeezed out most news about politics and economics. The troubles with the Euro continue to bubble away in the background, with periodic announcements that it has been "saved". These have led to short bursts of confidence until the markets have, on reflection, realised that the problems remain unresolved. And so they will. The Euro never was a viable project in the long term. The conditions for a shared currency were never going to be acceptable amongst a group of countries with diverse economies and traditions. Even if they had, the same problems of regional imbalance that affect countries internally would have developed and persisted on a larger scale within the single currency zone.

In the meantime, the argument about LVT seems to be perking up, what with Caroline Lucas's Parliamentary Bill and the tendency for just about every subject under the sun to be discussed on the internet. One of the things that surprises us is the amount of opposition to LVT from the "left". Someone under the name of "The Logical Conclusion" writes

What is the big deal with LVT?

E-mail Print PDF
The UK already has LVT now, in the form of Council Tax and the UBR. We are simply arguing that, to start with, the present system, which is messy and inefficient, needs to be tidied up. Why does everyone make such heavy weather of this, including LVT supporters?

Higher stamp duty puts damper on luxury market

E-mail Print PDF
Sales of luxury homes in London have dropped following the stamp duty changes in March. The expected increases in revenue are not materialising. Sales of homes worth more than £2m – the threshold at which the levy rises from 5 to 7 per cent – are down by 24 per cent in the four months since the budget. Sales which would have been at £2m and a bit have now been renegotiated to a bit under, according to one London estate agent.

Why is this a surprise? This is what happens when unprincipled taxes are applied. What is the principle behind stamp duty? Why should people become liable for tax when they sell a property? There is no justification for this charge other than to cover Land Registry costs. Here also is a good illustration of the tax incidence principle. The buyer pays, but the incidence of this tax is on the seller. To raise increase stamp duty was to compound the idiocy and demonstrated the Chancellor's economic illiteracy. It must make also one question the wisdom of the Office for Budget Responsibility as well, who approved the changes.
FT article


Keep the suggestions coming

E-mail Print PDF
Some ideas for a change of name. Here are a few that have turned up...

Land Value Tax Bill by Caroline Lucas: debate rescheduled to 26 April

E-mail Print PDF
The Private Member's Bill tabled by Caroline Lucas, Green Party MP for Brighton Pavilion was due to have been debated on 1 March but for some reason was not. It is now scheduled for debate on Friday 26 April. The wording of the Bill is to "require the Secretary of State to commission a programme of research into the merits of replacing the Council Tax and Non-domestic rates in England with an annual levy on the unimproved value of all land, including transitional arrangements; to report to Parliament within 12 months of completion of the research; and for connected purposes."

Tax avoidance - the posturing continues

E-mail Print PDF
People who pay cash in hand to tradesmen are “morally wrong”, damaging the economy and helping tax evaders, Treasury Minister David Gauke has warned. The report, in the Daily Telegraph, has produced over three thousand comments, nearly all of them hostile. Meanwhile, over at the Guardian, veteran warhorse Polly Toynbee has been sounding off about changes to the Council Tax benefit arrangements, but "forgot" to mention that the Council Tax is already heavily loaded against those who live in lower band accommodation, is based on hopelessly out of date valuations and in need of reform. At least it helps to support our case that the tax system is rotten through-and-through, but it is all posturing.

Page 12 of 34

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy.

I accept cookies from this site

EU Cookie Directive Plugin Information