Land Value Taxation Campaign

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Blog

The LVTC blog, by Henry Law

The comments in the LVTC Blog are a personal view of our Hon. Secretary Henry Law and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Campaign.

This is a place for personal observations and comments on politics, economics, current affairs, on-going discussions on the potential for LVT to remedy some of the current ills, and the impact on Society of any of the above. 

Please read and enjoy, and feel free to respond to Henry if you have any thing you would like to add.

More objections to LVT

E-mail Print PDF
These by email from someone called Richard Davis, of a company called Praetorian Properties, so not exactly a disinterested party. One would have thought that a property professional would have a better grasp of the implication of LVT, but seemingly not in this case. I tried to reply but the email was returned.

Why do we bother?

E-mail Print PDF
There was another article in the Guardian in support of LVT yesterday. This produced a torrent of the usual fatuous objections, which are well worth reading. Such is the void in understanding that it is clear that we have decades of work to do. Sometimes I wonder if it is worth bothering. If the British want to live in a country where the wealth divide is getting ever greater, to the point that serious social and political unrest is only just over the horizon, why should anyone try to stop this from happening?

Most of us in the LVT movement personally stand to lose if this policy was introduced. I don't know any poor "Georgists". We seem pretty good at understanding our own message and avoiding the worst effects of the present system of land tenure.

Read the article and comments here

Making housing affordable

E-mail Print PDF
"Making housing affordable" is a new contribution on housing policy produced by Policy Exchange (PE), which describes itself as "an independent, non-partisan educational charity, working with academics and policy makers from across the political spectrum, and particularly interested in free market and localist solutions to public policy questions."

Every single one of the assumptions on which the PE proposals are made can be shredded. Housing is affordable. The cost of bricks and mortar is no more than the price of building materials and the builders' wages. It is price of the housing land that is pushing up the price.

Join in the fun

E-mail Print PDF
The fun to be had is on the Guardian's Comment is Free discussion site. Opinions are expressed from across the political spectrum. Given the government's controversial policies, there are several debates a week on taxation and the economy. You can challenge what is said and have your comments tested in discussion.

New Left Project

E-mail Print PDF
I came across something called the New Left Project yesterday, which published a couple of articles under the title "Political Philosophy and the Left".

The first of the articles was mostly about the old issue of equality of opportunity versus equality of outcome, suggesting that equality of opportunity was not enough. This one has been argued over for as long as I can remember. Why is anyone even concerned about equality of outcome when there is less equality of opportunity now than since the end of the Second World War?

Free markets and safety nets

E-mail Print PDF
Free markets are not truly free unless land is freely available at the margin. Which is a complex idea and depends on an understanding of Ricardo's Law of Rent. You cannot have a partially free market any more than one can be partially pregnant.

The economy is not a circus stunt

In order to show that they are not totally lacking in compassion, advocates of these "free markets" then argue for a safety net for those who fall out of the system. But a safety net should not be necessary. The economy should not be a circus stunt. The system should be safe to start with. That is not an unattainable ideal.

Government would then only have to step in cases of emergencies such as natural disasters, wars, etc. Once there is a safety net, it becomes necessary to levy taxes in such a way that the two combine to establish a poverty trap and drive up employment costs. A vicious cycle is then set in place which is not sustainable.

Anarcho-Capitalism and its fallacies

E-mail Print PDF
Anarcho-Capitalism is rapidly emerging as the great delusion of our time.

Page 25 of 34

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy.

I accept cookies from this site

EU Cookie Directive Plugin Information